The intersection of swallow and evening paper Zhao: Is the food security bought back or be in charge of out

The intersection of swallow and evening paper Zhao: Is the food security bought back or be in charge of out
The intersection of swallow and evening paper Zhao: Is the food security bought back or be in charge of out
The relevant person of Municipal Quality Supervision Department in Guangzhou claims: It is bought back that safe. He thinks, the food should be accomplished safely, such links as the necessary process is examined, processed, packed, and in all these prices that will calculate the food. So, if consumers want to buy the food resting assured safely, should be in order to pay safely. (" Information Times " of June 22) Spending money can buy back the food security? This is illusion. Whether the food is safe, see two links in key: It is produced first, primitive, second, process the packaging course. True, the food reaches the nonpoisonous harmless standard of the security, ~s links of needing process to examine, process, pack etc., this needs input of advantage. But the intersection of we and the intersection of food security and issue not met under daily life, take place often in primitive to produce stage. For example, what the pig, duck, chicken fed is the feed with hormone; What the fish took is contraceptive; Vegetables such as the cucumber, tomato,etc. are that ripener, hormone,etc. accelerated the ripening; Fruit vegetables, pesticide remains, often exceeds standard All these things, spend many money, can buy back getting safe? As to illegal businessman, it is their only option to chase profits, and does not consider the social responsibility and conscience at all. From " poisonous wine " , " poisonous rice " To " source incident of Anhui China " , " happy not incident " ,From " red No. one in the Sudan " " the underground drainage is oily " to get ,Which one the intersection of food security and incident, trade company possessed with a lust for gain and conscience die out trouble that make? Consumers buy safely, is it bought that who look for? Where to go to buy? Say that is " bought back safely " ,Its unspoken words in a play is: The food security incident that appeared in the past, the fault lay in the public " too bad money " ,It is right to overly seek making cheap. While the relevant person of Municipal Quality Supervision Department in Guangzhou pushes a stream of brains of responsibility to the public, have hardly born any responsibility by oneself. If the public spends money buying back the food security, what do we also want departments such as quality testing, hygiene, industry and commerce,etc. to use? For many years, the danger that the food security has caused to us, except that the trade company is possessed with a lust for gain, non-performance, lazy policy and supervision omission of the relevant department of the government are main reasons. To leak scarce institutional management system, the intersection of food and base that potential safety hazard store in. Hui MingSheng


|