Should have people's interests in mind while debating fiercely the medical reform scheme

Should have people's interests in mind while debating fiercely the medical reform scheme
Should have people's interests in mind while debating fiercely the medical reform scheme
Stop all most places of the new medical reform dispute at present, happen on the basic medicine system. The dispute mainly takes place among two major departments - --Ministry of Public Health and department that protects people. " economic report in 21st century " is called it on November 5: The people of Ministry of Public Health protect the basic medical system of new medical reform of a fierce dispute. The dispute is mainly launched in two focuses: One is battle of the new catalogue, namely: Keep the current " medical insurance catalogue " and rebuild " basic medicine catalogue "; Second, the production of the basic medicine system supplies the mode, Ministry of Public Health should produce by fixed position, provide and deliver directly, unified price, and " force " The intersection of medical organization and use, and department who protects people want, give play to medical insurance organization mainly " group purchase " of person who pay as medicines Strength, negotiate with the medicines supplier out a reasonable basic medicine price. " medical insurance catalogue " and " basic medicine catalogue ", it is only only an appellation question in layman's view, but to protect a constructor different from two pieces of these of Ministry of Public Health to people, mean how many basic the intersection of medicine and catalogue that departments puts forward does it adopt, who dominate basic the intersection of medicine and purchase, produce, whole roller chain of person who supply with: Ministry of Public Health need, set up basic medicine, supply system with only, from producing to using one through to the end; And the department that protects people wants to give play to the strength of group purchase to implement the centralized purchasing of basic medicine. And then come to see their own schemes. There is obvious plan color in scheme of Ministry of Public Health, how to supervise effectively, prevent breeding and monopolizing by fixed position, root out power and seek and rent the space, I'm afraid it is a not very good difficult problem that solve, the relevant person of people's protecting department has pointed out this sharply too. However, the medical insurance organization can't serve as the strength of real market either conversely, come with the negotiation negociation price of medicines producers by it, whether seek and rent the space too? If as it always goes, " Debate fiercely " ,Just point out the defect in the other side's scheme, and ignore the same defect and also exist in oneself, just want Israel " Mine no the completion scheme " Come to replace " Yours no the completion scheme " ," debate fiercely " It will be unable to achieve the goal of improving the basic medicine system and making people satisfied. I think, since " debates fiercely " of the basic medicine system ,Certainly should regard basic medicine system as core, everything should for improve the basic medicine system, think about. Obviously, improve basic the intersection of medicine and key of system, lie in until who leading right is given better, this is a one without perfect answer; And lie in what kind of restraint and supervision are implemented to relevant power, could make the design original intention of the basic medicine system really be realized. It is all to stop (the staff member in Hangzhou)


|