The lotion of beef " the not prohibition namely legal" ?

The lotion of beef " the not prohibition, namely legal" ?
The lotion of beef " the not prohibition, namely legal" ?
Small firm the day before yesterday, the intersection of Guangzhou and the intersection of city and relevant the intersection of department and " the magical the intersection of beef and lotion " The incident is responded and said: So long as the country has not forbidden using yet, even if its existence is legal. The related departments can respond so the social focus in time, this, deserve it certainly, but not always felt enough yet. As to supervision department, except supervise the operation of the trade company, seem that should also offer the guarantee for legitimate rights and interests of the trade company. Since " lotion of magical beef " It is legal, should the rumor that then exists everywhere at present be prevented? Whether the related departments have considered, can adopt and for example " take the lead to try eating " stepping forward bravely Practical action,it be wanted strength very, that trade company is normal for operationed, and last consumer confidence against food security? I think, want to give citizens a satisfactory reply, the supervision department must totally clear up " lotion of beef " at first Finally what it is about the incident. The focus which citizens pay close attention to at present, " what I spent obviously is the price of the beef, what why is bought is the pork " ? This should be Israel " The meat " And manage the sincere question for central product quality, but the response of the supervision department is to write an essay around additive. Additive has no question, " hang the ox one and sell pork " Conduct legal? It has not forbidden that even so, ", namely legal" Really have certain meanings rigorously and creates the steady management environment for trade company to safeguarding the law. But therefore can infer, the law has not been forbidden, can responsible institutions leave alone or be in charge of? The food security involves citizens' vital interests, and the question is constant, effective execution of supervisory system, with sentence respect to in advance while being accurate, related departments can make, far above " Trust to chance and strokes of luck " Then few. This can be compared to you to see obviously that holding the knife alone enters the door, but unmoved to this, must just go to take action after he touches it, then everything is too late. The policymaker should never shift to predicting the risk on general citizens, if let a person judge whether the consumer goods have questions at will, is it used that what also want the responsible institution? In the face of the numerous and complicated and complicated consumer goods market, common people do not understand at all what is that the country forbids, what is that there is not the one that forbids in the country. The so-called information based on asymmetric foundation discloses having no convincingness at all. Moreover, some of subordinates of responsible institution spend check organization and laboratory set up of several million yuan numerously easily, " who advocating, who puts to the proof " it is very necessary Principle in front of have difficulty in taking a step! What do general citizens have? Some have only spent flesh and blood that evolved in several million years, how to stand such and such tossing about.


|